GIPA vs Confidentiality: Sandercock v The Hills
This case explains that calling a document “commercial-in-confidence” isn’t enough. The GIPA Act requires councils to prove why.
Read MoreExploring planning, environment, and local government law issues in New South Wales
This case explains that calling a document “commercial-in-confidence” isn’t enough. The GIPA Act requires councils to prove why.
Read MoreThe recent decision in Mount Druitt Inn Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2026] NSWLEC 1390 reinforces an important legal principle that is often overlooked: before anyone gets to the planning merits, the consent authority (or the Court) must first have the legal power to consider the modification at all.
Read MoreThe Court of Appeal has confirmed that once a council knows about an obvious, low-cost hazard, failing to fix it will expose it to liability – and statutory protections won’t step in to help.
Read MoreSection 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is one of the most frequently cited (and misunderstood) provisions in the NSW planning system.
Read MoreThey are useful, but they are also frequently misunderstood.
Read MoreThis decision shows when a council can refuse to deal with a repeat GIPA application where the same information has already been considered.
Read MoreThis case explains how agencies should assess whether dealing with a GIPA request would require an unreasonable and substantial diversion of resources.
Read MoreLegal professional privilege remains a powerful reason to refuse access under the GIPA Act, including where the advice comes from in-house council lawyers.
Read MoreTwo common GIPA issues are considered – what counts as reasonable searches for documents, and how legal professional privilege applies.
Read MoreAccess a concise summary of the planning reforms introduced in January 2026.
Read More