“No Dwelling Entitlement” Isn’t a Legal Test – Wilson v Kiama Municipal Council
The Land and Environment Court has now made it clear that the phrase is just that.
Read MoreExploring planning, environment, and local government law issues in New South Wales
The Land and Environment Court has now made it clear that the phrase is just that.
Read MoreThe recent decision in Mount Druitt Inn Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2026] NSWLEC 1390 reinforces an important legal principle that is often overlooked: before anyone gets to the planning merits, the consent authority (or the Court) must first have the legal power to consider the modification at all.
Read MoreA dispute over whether a development consent had lapsed turned on the precise wording of a deferred commencement condition.
Read MoreA modification approval unravelled after the Court found the council assessed it under the wrong DCP.
Read MoreIn the first decision interpreting the Recognise Country Guidelines, the Court confirmed that Aboriginal cultural heritage considerations must meaningfully inform a development’s design at DA stage.
Read MoreEven where a landowner fails to beat the Valuer-General’s determination, the Court may still award them costs.
Read MoreThis decision delivers some reminders when dealing with variation requests, development within the foreshore, owner’s consent, and the ways in which the Court will consider controls within local environmental plans.
Read MoreIn a recent procedural ruling, the Land and Environment Court allowed a nearby landowner to join a Class 1 appeal concerning a 30-metre telecommunications tower.
Read MoreDespite a long and fraught litigation history and striking similarities between the two applications, the Court ultimately allowed the new merit appeal to proceed, finding it was not an abuse of process.
Read MoreThere can be serious cost consequences in Class 4 appeals to the Land and Environment Court.
Read More