Lapsing of development consents – Donvito v Hawkesbury City Council

May 23, 2022.Reading time 10 minutes.

When a local council and an applicant are in disagreement, the Court has the power to determine whether a consent has lapsed (or not).

Looking into the crystal ball – Parrot v Kiama Municipal Council

May 17, 2022.Reading time 4 minutes.

The judgment of Parrot v Kiama Municipal Council provides guidance with respect to development applications for subdivision, and when we may need to consider the impacts of future development on the land (like houses or other structures).

The reason for reasons – Al Maha v Huajun Investments

May 15, 2022.Reading time 9 minutes.

In 2018, the NSW Court of Appeal handed down a very important judgment which changed the approach to the publication of reasons by Commissioners in the Land and Environment Court.

Retrospective approval – Windy Dropdown v Warringah Council

February 17, 2022.Reading time 4 minutes.

There are very limited pathways available to obtain approval for development that has already been carried out.

No mods of Contribution Conditions – Ku-ring-gai Council v Buyozo Pty Ltd

August 26, 2021.Reading time 10 minutes.

In Ku-ring-gai Council v Buyozo Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 177, the NSW Court of Appeal determined that there is no power to modify a development consent to amend a condition of consent requiring a monetary contribution.

Mods of Mods – they’re back

July 15, 2021.Reading time 1 minute.

On 14 July 2021 legislation was published to permit modification applications to be amended.

Mods of Mods – AQC Dartbrook Management v THE Minister

June 16, 2021.Reading time 9 minutes.

A judgment of the NSW Supreme Court of Appeal has raised significant doubts regarding the power to amend a modification application.

Negligence and local councils

April 28, 2021.Reading time 2 minutes.

In some instances a local council may be liable in relation to negligence, including with respect to development consents.

In the news – Clause 4.6 variations

March 28, 2021.Reading time 2 minutes.

Following an inquiry into the former Canterbury City Council, ICAC has made some interesting recommendations in relation to the use of clause 4.6 variation requests.