Exploring planning, environment, and local government law issues in New South Wales
Author: Alyce Kliese
Alyce is a civil engineer and a practicing lawyer, who has a desire to share her insights on the legal and practical realities of the development industry.
In this judgment, the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales examined a dispute over access to government information relating to a project in the local government area.
The judgment of Georges River Council v Eskander [2024] NSWLEC 98 provides insight into how courts approach requirements for adequate arrangements for essential services.
The first GIPA judgment for 2025 is here and provides an examination of the competing public interest considerations for and against disclosure of government information in growth centres.
The New South Wales Court of Appeal’s decision in Cameron v Woollahra Municipal Council [2024] NSWCA 216 tackles the often thorny issues surrounding construction certificates, jurisdictional error, and legal unreasonableness in planning law.
The case of Blues Point Hotel Property Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2021] NSWLEC 27 offers valuable insights into the interpretation and application of existing use rights.
The legal landscape in 2024 has delivered some truly fascinating cases, providing valuable insights into the intricacies of planning, local government and development law in New South Wales.
The recent decision in Symin v The Hills Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1840 highlights the complexities of residential development above critical infrastructure, with Sydney Metro playing a role in the proceedings.
The recent Court of Appeal decision in Goldmate Property Luddenham No. 1 Pty Ltd v Transport for NSW offers a crucial clarification on how the concept of “public purpose” must be properly understood in the context of compulsory land acquisition.
The Land and Environment Court’s decision in Billyard Avenue Developments Pty Limited v The Council of the City of Sydney serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of adhering to planning controls and understanding the boundaries of consent orders.
In the recent decision of Amplitel Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council highlights significant considerations for assessing DAs involving telecommunications infrastructure.