Legal Professional Privilege Under GIPA: Curtis v Penrith City Council
Legal professional privilege remains a powerful reason to refuse access under the GIPA Act, including where the advice comes from in-house council lawyers.
Read MoreExploring planning, environment, and local government law issues in New South Wales
Legal professional privilege remains a powerful reason to refuse access under the GIPA Act, including where the advice comes from in-house council lawyers.
Read MoreTwo common GIPA issues are considered – what counts as reasonable searches for documents, and how legal professional privilege applies.
Read MoreAccess a concise summary of the planning reforms introduced in January 2026.
Read MoreWhen information is released, it is treated as disclosure to the public at large, not just to the person who made the application.
Read MoreCan you consolidate lots, redraw them, and still call it a “boundary adjustment”? The Land and Environment Court says no.
Read MoreA dispute over whether a development consent had lapsed turned on the precise wording of a deferred commencement condition.
Read MoreA modification approval unravelled after the Court found the council assessed it under the wrong DCP.
Read MoreIn the first decision interpreting the Recognise Country Guidelines, the Court confirmed that Aboriginal cultural heritage considerations must meaningfully inform a development’s design at DA stage.
Read MoreEven where a landowner fails to beat the Valuer-General’s determination, the Court may still award them costs.
Read MoreThis decision delivers some reminders when dealing with variation requests, development within the foreshore, owner’s consent, and the ways in which the Court will consider controls within local environmental plans.
Read More