Exploring planning, environment, and local government law issues in New South Wales
Author: Alyce Kliese
Alyce is a civil engineer and a practicing lawyer, who has a desire to share her insights on the legal and practical realities of the development industry.
The recent decision of Burns v Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council provides a concise summary of the principles to consider when appealing a judgment of the Land and Environment Court.
Recent changes to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation could create uncertainty as to when an application is considered to be “lodged”.
The annual report highlights an increase in complaints and also shines a light on investigations into some councils which provide timely reminders for all.
The decision of Council of the Kool Family Developments Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council provides a reminder that objectives of the zone are a relevant consideration when considering the merits of a development application.
The recent decision of Sader v Elgammal provides some timely comments from the Court regarding consistency between development consents and construction certificates.
In the case of Ballina Shire Council v Joblin [2022] NSWLEC 90, the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales underscored the paramount importance of drafting clear and unambiguous orders.
The decision of Council of the City of Ryde v Network Developments NSW provides a warning to those obtaining complying development certificates (known as CDCs). In particular, it is critical that the lawfulness of issuing a CDC is considered at the date of issue.